On 22.04.2025 13:41, Andrew Cooper wrote: > We have a mix of all 3 spellings in Xen, as well as having compatibility in > compiler.h for older C standards. > > Remove the use of __alignof() and __alignof__(), which reduced code volume a > little. > > No functional change. > > Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com>
Acked-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> as it seems sufficiently unlikely that ... > --- > xen/arch/x86/xstate.c | 4 ++-- > xen/common/coverage/gcc_3_4.c | 4 ++-- > xen/common/device-tree/device-tree.c | 8 ++++---- > xen/include/xen/config.h | 2 +- > xen/include/xen/percpu.h | 2 +- > xen/include/xen/xmalloc.h | 16 ++++++++-------- > xen/include/xen/xvmalloc.h | 16 ++++++++-------- > 7 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) ... the headers here might want re-using from outside of xen/. As mentioned on Matrix the other day when a question was raised about asm() vs its similar alternative spellings, I think it's generally a good idea to keep headers tidy of possible name space conflicts. Just that for the ones touched here this seems pretty unimportant. Jan
