Continuing a discussion from before:
On 4/22/2025 11:44 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
Caution: This message originated from an External Source. Use proper caution
when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding.
On 23.04.2025 01:43, victorm.l...@amd.com wrote:
memmove.
- Tagged as `deliberate` for ECLAIR.
+ * - R5.5
+ - Clashes between function-like macros and function names are
+ deliberate
They may or may not be deliberate, depending on context. I don't think it's a
good move to deviate this more widely than necessary. If I get the expression
above (in deviations.ecl) right, even
void func1(int);
void func2(int);
#define func1() func2(0)
#define func2() func1(0)
would be deviated, which I don't think we want. Especially when, in a less
contrived scenario, the clash may not easily be visible.
OK, I see the issue for different functions. Does it make sense to say
it's deliberate when it's the same identifier?
void func1(int);
...
#define func1() func1(0)
Could this be deviated?
Victor
