On 2025-04-24 00:46, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 23/04/2025 9:55 pm, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Wed, 23 Apr 2025, Nicola Vetrini wrote:
__inline was not mentioned in C-language-toolchain.rst, while
__inline__ is not used in code under xen/. __inline is kept because
it
may be used in Xen. The ECLAIR configuration is now consistent with
the
documented extensions in the rst file.
No functional change.
Signed-off-by: Nicola Vetrini <nicola.vetr...@bugseng.com>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabell...@kernel.org>
Hmm. f96e2f64576cd
I take it that patch shouldn't have gone in then?
Regardless, now that we're putting it back in, we should put in both
__inline and __inline__, so as not to need to come back and repeat this
patch again.
~Andrew
Did I miss the addition of __inline__ here?
https://lore.kernel.org/xen-devel/20250422113957.1289290-1-andrew.coop...@citrix.com/
No issue with adjusting it as you wrote, but my understanding was that
only __inline will reenter the codebase.
--
Nicola Vetrini, B.Sc.
Software Engineer
BUGSENG (https://bugseng.com)
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/nicola-vetrini-a42471253
