On Thu, May 01, 2025 at 03:22:55PM +0000, Brendan Jackman wrote: > Whereas enlarging the pool of functions that you can _optionally target_ > for tracing, or nice reliable breakpoints in GDB, and disasm that's > easier to mentally map back to C, seems like a helpful improvement for > test builds. Personally I sometimes spam a bunch of `noinline` into code > I'm debugging so this seems like a way to just slap that same thing on > the whole tree without dirtying the code, right?
Dunno, I'm more of the printk school of debugging. Very rarely do I bother with GDB (so rare in fact that I have to look up how to even do this).