On Wed, May 07, 2025 at 06:38:45AM +0000, Chen, Jiqian wrote:
> On 2025/5/7 00:00, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 21, 2025 at 02:18:58PM +0800, Jiqian Chen wrote:
> >> +    }
> >> +
> >> +    /* PCI_CAP_LIST_NEXT register of target capability */
> >> +    list_del(&next_r->node);
> >> +    spin_unlock(&vpci->lock);
> >> +    xfree(next_r);
> > 
> > Here vpci_remove_register() could also be used, but it will involve
> > searching again for the register to remove, which is a bit pointless.
> Yes, so just keeping things here instead of calling vpci_remove_register()?

I would add a small comment that we avoid calling
vpci_remove_register() to not have to redo the register search.

Thanks, Roger.

Reply via email to