On 12.05.2025 13:58, Andrew Cooper wrote: > --- a/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/idt.h > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/include/asm/idt.h > @@ -92,15 +92,16 @@ static inline void _set_gate_lower(idt_entry_t *gate, > unsigned long type, > * Update the lower half handler of an IDT entry, without changing any other > * configuration. > */ > -static inline void _update_gate_addr_lower(idt_entry_t *gate, void *addr) > +static inline void _update_gate_addr_lower(idt_entry_t *gate, void *_addr)
Considering comment and name of the function, ... > { > + unsigned long addr = (unsigned long)_addr; > + unsigned int addr1 = addr & 0xffff0000U; /* GCC force better codegen. */ > idt_entry_t idte; > - idte.a = gate->a; > > - idte.b = ((unsigned long)(addr) >> 32); > - idte.a &= 0x0000FFFFFFFF0000ULL; > - idte.a |= (((unsigned long)(addr) & 0xFFFF0000UL) << 32) | > - ((unsigned long)(addr) & 0xFFFFUL); > + idte.b = addr >> 32; ... doesn't this line want dropping altogether? Or at best be an assertion? Jan > + idte.a = gate->a & 0x0000ffffffff0000UL; > + idte.a |= (unsigned long)addr1 << 32; > + idte.a |= addr & 0xffff; > > _write_gate_lower(gate, &idte); > }