On 23/07/2025 2:56 pm, Yann Sionneau wrote:
> xen.efi PE does not boot when loaded from shim or some patched
> downstream grub2.
>
> What happens is the bootloader would honour the MEM_DISCARDABLE
> flag of the .reloc section meaning it would not load its content
> into memory.
>
> But Xen is parsing the .reloc section content twice at boot:
> * https://elixir.bootlin.com/xen/v4.20.1/source/xen/common/efi/boot.c#L1362
> * 
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/xen/v4.20.1/source/xen/arch/x86/efi/efi-boot.h#L237
>
> Therefore it would crash with the following message:
> "Unsupported relocation type" as reported there:
>
> * https://github.com/QubesOS/qubes-issues/issues/8206#issuecomment-2619048838
> * 
> https://lore.kernel.org/xen-devel/7e039262-1f54-46e1-8f70-ac3f03607...@suse.com/T/#me122b9e6c27cd98db917da2c9f67e74a2c6ad7a5
>
> This commit adds a small C host tool named keeprelocs
> that is called after xen.efi is produced by the build system
> in order to remove this bit from its .reloc section header.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yann Sionneau <yann.sionn...@vates.tech>
> ---
>  xen/Makefile           |   5 +-
>  xen/arch/x86/Makefile  |   1 +
>  xen/tools/Makefile     |   3 ++
>  xen/tools/keeprelocs.c | 119 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 127 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>  create mode 100644 xen/tools/keeprelocs.c

I'm sick and tired of the hoops we have to jump through for broken
tooling.  This is now rewriting the PE+ metadata because apparently the
linker can't do it correctly.

Either fix the linker (or the way we drive it/etc), or we're doing away
with PE+ emulation entirely and writing the MZ/PE headers by hand like
literally every other kernel does.

This is a level of technical debt I consider unreasonable to take.

Also, note that your analysis points at a common code file, yet this is
an x86-specific bodge.

~Andrew

Reply via email to