On 13.08.2025 13:25, Andrew Cooper wrote:
> On 12/08/2025 10:19 am, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> On 08.08.2025 22:23, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>>> Since commit a35816b5cae8 ("x86/traps: Introduce early_traps_init() and
>>> simplify setup"), load_system_tables() is called later on the BSP, so the
>>> SYS_STATE_early_boot check can be dropped from the safety BUG_ON().
>>>
>>> Move the BUILD_BUG_ON() into build_assertions(),
>> I'm not quite convinced of this move - having the related BUILD_BUG_ON()
>> and BUG_ON() next to each other would seem better to me.
> 
> I don't see a specific reason for them to be together, and the comment
> explains what's going on.
> 
> With FRED, we want a related BUILD_BUG_ON(), but there's no equivalent
> BUG_ON() because MSR_RSP_SL0 will #GP on being misaligned.

That BUILD_BUG_ON() could then sit next to the MSR write? Unless of course
that ends up sitting in an assembly source.

Jan

Reply via email to