On 04.09.25 00:37, Volodymyr Babchuk wrote:
Hi Oleksandr,
Hello Volodymyr
Oleksandr Tyshchenko <olekst...@gmail.com> writes:
[...]
+static inline uint32_t vgic_get_reg_offset(uint32_t reg, uint32_t spi_base,
+ uint32_t espi_base)
+{
+ if ( reg < espi_base )
+ return reg - spi_base;
+ else
+ return reg - espi_base;
+}
I am wondering (I do not request a change) whether
vgic_get_reg_offset() is really helpfull,
e.g. is
offset = vgic_get_reg_offset(reg, GICD_IPRIORITYR, GICD_IPRIORITYRnE);
much better than:
offset = reg < GICD_IPRIORITYRnE ? reg - GICD_IPRIORITYR : reg -
GICD_IPRIORITYRnE;
IMO, it is easy to make a mistake, because you need to write register
name 3 times. Can cause errors during copy-pasting.
I got it
But I saw clever
trick by Mykola Kvach, something like this:
#define vgic_get_reg_offset(addr, reg_name) ( addr < reg_name##nE ? \
addr - reg_name : addr - reg_name##nE )
And then you can just use this as
offset = vgic_get_reg_offset(reg, GICD_IPRIORITYR)
From my PoV, the idea looks good
I don't know what maintainers think about this type of preprocessor
trickery, but in my opinion it is justified in this case, because it
leaves less room for a mistake.
