Hi Milan, Milan Djokic <[email protected]> writes:
> On 9/1/25 13:06, Milan Djokic wrote: [...] > > Hello Volodymyr, Julien > > Sorry for the delayed follow-up on this topic. > We have changed vIOMMU design from 1-N to N-N mapping between vIOMMU > and pIOMMU. Considering single vIOMMU model limitation pointed out by > Volodymyr (SID overlaps), vIOMMU-per-pIOMMU model turned out to be the > only proper solution. > Following is the updated design document. > I have added additional details to the design and performance impact > sections, and also indicated future improvements. Security > considerations section is unchanged apart from some minor details > according to review comments. > Let me know what do you think about updated design. Once approved, I > will send the updated vIOMMU patch series. This looks fine for me. I can't see any immediate flaws here. So let's get to patches :) [...] -- WBR, Volodymyr
