On Wed, 2014-11-12 at 10:04 -0500, Zhigang Wang wrote: > On 11/12/2014 09:52 AM, Ian Campbell wrote: > > On Wed, 2014-11-12 at 09:48 -0500, Zhigang Wang wrote: > >> On 11/12/2014 09:40 AM, Ian Campbell wrote: > >>> On Wed, 2014-11-12 at 09:36 -0500, Zhigang Wang wrote: > >>>> Also I want clarify one thing: the @introduceDomain watch is triggered > >>>> at the same > >>>> time for xm/xend and xl: when VM fully migrated. > >>>> > >>>> The different between xm/xend and xl is: xend will populate destination > >>>> side VM > >>>> xenstore entries at the beginning of migration. > >>> > >>> Do you mean *before* @introduceDomain has triggered? > >> > >> Yes, from my test. I didn't check the code logic yet. > > > > I think anything which is trying to inspect the state of a domain before > > the corresponding @introduceDomain and expecting anything more complex > > than the fact of that domain's existence is broken.
I think I may have asked the wrong question there and then read the answer in the context of the question I thought I'd asked. IOW most of the rest of my mail was predicated on xend behaving differently to how you've just explained via showing completeRestore(). It seems Wei is on the case so I'm just going to butt out... Ian _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
