On Wed, Jan 07, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Wed, 2015-01-07 at 16:49 +0000, Ian Jackson wrote: > > Certainly removing this feature this late in the 4.5 release cycle is > > not appropriate. > > I agree that faffing around with the initscripts/systemd units at the > eleventh hour seem liable to leave us with a release where xenstored > doesn't start or something.
What about staging, is that how it is supposed to look like in 4.6? Or should I rather work on the wrapper script so that XENSTORED_TRACE has to be used? I would like to see patch #1 in 4.5 as the proper way to pass additional options to xenstored. Olaf _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
