Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [PATCH RFC] make error codes a formal part of the
ABI"):
> On Tue, 2015-01-13 at 16:21 +0000, Jan Beulich wrote:
> > There's on small block commented with TBD left in the public header.
> > This is the main reason for the submission being RFC. While we don't
> > currently use these error codes, I'm not sure if we should leave all
> > or some of them out for the time being.
>
> I say lets omit any we don't use for now.
Is it possible that anyone is using the existing header file where
these values were defined ? If so their code might say
case ELOOP:
which would not compile when they switched to the new header.
I don't know whether this is likely, or a problem.
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
