On Wed, 2015-01-14 at 12:53 +0000, Julien Grall wrote: > Minor updates to the documentation in xen/include/public/arch-arm.h: > - Comments coding style fix > - Typoes > - Update the list of supported hypercalls by ARM > - Remove uncessary comment about 64bit.
"unnecessary" > Signed-off-by: Julien Grall <julien.gr...@linaro.org> > Cc: Ian Jackson <ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com> > Cc: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> > Cc: Keir Fraser <k...@xen.org> > > --- > I'm not sure if we usually backport documentation. If so, I'd like > to request backporting for Xen 4.5. I don't think we need to TBH, any development should be against unstable and we publish these headers online for ease of access. > + * All generic sub-operations > * > * HYPERVISOR_domctl > * All generic sub-operations, with the exception of: > - * * XEN_DOMCTL_iomem_permission (not yet implemented) > * * XEN_DOMCTL_irq_permission (not yet implemented) > * > * HYPERVISOR_sched_op > @@ -183,7 +178,7 @@ > * XEN_GUEST_HANDLE represents a guest pointer, when passed as a field > * in a struct in memory. On ARM is always 8 bytes sizes and 8 bytes > * aligned. > - * XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM represent a guest pointer, when passed as an > + * XEN_GUEST_HANDLE_PARAM represents a guest pointer, when passed as an > * hypercall argument. It is 4 bytes on aarch and 8 bytes on aarch64. Is there a "32" missing in this last sentence do you think? (not the bit you touched) I can fix the "unnecessary" on commit, so: Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campb...@citrix.com> Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
