On 3/21/2017 1:03 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 18.03.17 at 11:53, <yu.c.zh...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
--- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c
+++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/hvm.c
@@ -1870,18 +1870,14 @@ int hvm_hap_nested_page_fault(paddr_t gpa, unsigned 
long gla,
           (npfec.write_access &&
            (p2m_is_discard_write(p2mt) || (p2mt == p2m_ioreq_server))) )
      {
-        __put_gfn(p2m, gfn);
-        if ( ap2m_active )
-            __put_gfn(hostp2m, gfn);
-
          rc = 0;
          if ( unlikely(is_pvh_domain(currd)) )
-            goto out;
+            goto out_put_gfn;
Did you forget to re-base onto staging before you've sent this?
is_pvh_domain() was gone before your submission already. When
re-basing, feel free to also drop the dead "rc = 0;" line.

Oops...
I did a rebase days ago, but did not send the patch directly. There were some XenGT test performed based on these patch.
Sorry, I should have a check.  Will resend the patch. :)

B.R.
Yu
Jan




_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Reply via email to