>>> On 27.03.17 at 15:19, <yi.y....@linux.intel.com> wrote: > On 17-03-27 06:51:07, Jan Beulich wrote: >> >>> On 27.03.17 at 14:24, <yi.y....@linux.intel.com> wrote: >> > Please check above comments. Maybe below definitions are better? >> > PSR_INFO_IDX_CAT_CBM_LEN >> > PSR_INFO_IDX_COS_MAX >> > PSR_INFO_IDX_CAT_FLAG >> > PSR_INFO_ARRAY_SIZE >> >> But why would the array size be 3 for some feature only having >> COS_MAX (for example)? I think you should >> - put common indexes first >> - have PSR_INFO_CAT_ARRAY_SIZE (or PSR_INFO_NUM_IDX_CAT >> or whatever, but with CAT in it). >> > Per current known features, all of them (CAT/MBA) have three members in > HW info. So, I think we can define ARRAY_SIZE to 3 and define its name to > a common name so far.
Okay then. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
