On 09/05/17 21:24, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 11:10:24AM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 04/05/17 00:17, Glenn Enright wrote:
On 04/05/17 04:58, Steven Haigh wrote:
On 04/05/17 01:53, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 03/05/17 12:45, Steven Haigh wrote:
Just wanted to give this a little nudge now people seem to be back on
deck...
Glenn, could you please give the attached patch a try?
It should be applied on top of the other correction, the old debug
patch should not be applied.
I have added some debug output to make sure we see what is happening.
This patch is included in kernel-xen-4.9.26-1
It should be in the repos now.
Still seeing the same issue. Without the extra debug patch all I see in
the logs after destroy is this...
xen-blkback: xen_blkif_disconnect: busy
xen-blkback: xen_blkif_free: delayed = 0
Hmm, to me it seems as if some grant isn't being unmapped.
Looking at gnttab_unmap_refs_async() I wonder how this is supposed to
work:
I don't see how a grant would ever be unmapped in case of
page_count(item->pages[pc]) > 1 in __gnttab_unmap_refs_async(). All it
does is deferring the call to the unmap operation again and again. Or
am I missing something here?
No, I don't think you are missing anything, but I cannot see how this can be
solved in a better way, unmapping a page that's still referenced is certainly
not the best option, or else we risk triggering a page-fault elsewhere.
IMHO, gnttab_unmap_refs_async should have a timeout, and return an error at
some point. Also, I'm wondering whether there's a way to keep track of who has
references on a specific page, but so far I haven't been able to figure out how
to get this information from Linux.
Also, I've noticed that __gnttab_unmap_refs_async uses page_count, shouldn't it
use page_ref_count instead?
Roger.
In case it helps, I have continued to work on this. I notices processed
left behind (under 4.9.27). The same issue is ongoing.
# ps auxf | grep [x]vda
root 2983 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 01:44 0:00 \_
[1.xvda1-1]
root 5457 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 02:06 0:00 \_
[3.xvda1-1]
root 7382 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 02:36 0:00 \_
[4.xvda1-1]
root 9668 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 02:51 0:00 \_
[6.xvda1-1]
root 11080 0.0 0.0 0 0 ? S 02:57 0:00 \_
[7.xvda1-1]
# xl list
Name ID Mem VCPUs State Time(s)
Domain-0 0 1512 2 r----- 118.5
(null) 1 8 4 --p--d 43.8
(null) 3 8 4 --p--d 6.3
(null) 4 8 4 --p--d 73.4
(null) 6 8 4 --p--d 14.7
(null) 7 8 4 --p--d 30
Those all have...
[root 11080]# cat wchan
xen_blkif_schedule
[root 11080]# cat stack
[<ffffffff814eaee8>] xen_blkif_schedule+0x418/0xb40
[<ffffffff810a0555>] kthread+0xe5/0x100
[<ffffffff816f1c45>] ret_from_fork+0x25/0x30
[<ffffffffffffffff>] 0xffffffffffffffff
So I can give anything that is in the /proc/pid space. 'maps' and
'pagemap' are empty fwiw.
I also have perf tools installed on this box in case anyone has anything
I can run with that which might help.
A reminder I can replicate by doing xl destroy $domU while running this
inside the domU. Has anyone else been able to repeat this?
{
while true; do
dd bs=1M count=512 if=/dev/zero of=test conv=fdatasync
done
}
This does not work in 4.4 kernels, so there is possibly a regression of
some sort?
Regards, Glenn
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel