On 18/08/17 13:08, Wei Liu wrote: > On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 04:08:44AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: >> >> If it can't be static anymore, and considering it's just a wrapper >> around another function call, would there be anything wrong with >> making it an inline function in the header? > Yes it can be done: > > ---8<--- > From 129ea54249114f97fe66b85672f1710c5f63f604 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Wei Liu <wei.l...@citrix.com> > Date: Wed, 19 Jul 2017 16:15:48 +0100 > Subject: [PATCH] x86: move pv_emul_is_mem_write to pv/emulate.h > > Make it a static inline function in pv/emulate.h. In the mean time it > is required to include pv/emulate.h in x86/mm.c. > > The said function will be used later by different emulation handlers > in later patches. > > Signed-off-by: Wei Liu <wei.l...@citrix.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
