2015-03-02 14:50 GMT+00:00 Ian Campbell <ian.campb...@citrix.com>:
> On Fri, 2015-02-27 at 14:08 +0000, Frediano Ziglio wrote:
>> Translated addresses (in d->arch.vgic.{c,d}base) are now bus addresses
>> which could not always be applied to the DT.
>> Copy the original addresses from DT directly to get the original
>> untranslated reg property which will give same d->arch.vgic.{c,d}base
>> values once translated again.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Frediano Ziglio <frediano.zig...@huawei.com>
>
> Acked + applied. I reworded the commit message a bit in an attempt to
> make it clearer:
>
> xen/arm: Handle translated addresses for hardware domains in GICv2
>
> Translated addresses (in d->arch.vgic.{c,d}base) are bus addresses
> which are not always correct in the context of a subnode in the DTB
> exposed to domain 0 since they would then be subject to retranslation.
>
> Copy the original addresses from DT directly to get the original
> untranslated reg property which will give same d->arch.vgic.{c,d}base
> values once translated again by the guest.
>
> Signed-off-by: Frediano Ziglio <frediano.zig...@huawei.com>
> Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campb...@citrix.com>
> [ ijc -- attempt to clarify the commit message ]
>
> I hope that is ok.
>
Perfect!
Thanks,
Frediano
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
