>>> On 12.09.17 at 02:37, <kon...@kernel.org> wrote: > The ELF specification mentions nothing about the sh_size being > modulo the sh_addralign. Only that sh_addr MUST be aligned on > sh_addralign if sh_addralign is not zero or one. > > We on loading did not take this in-to account so this patch adds > a check on the ELF file as it is being parsed. > > Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.w...@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> albeit generally I'd recommend the check to be done in the opposite order. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
