On Tue, 2015-03-03 at 17:59 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote: > Wei Liu, le Tue 03 Mar 2015 16:58:07 +0000, a écrit : > > Rump kernel doesn't use mini-os's fd management facility so there is no > > alloc_fd etc. On the other hand this makes me think number 1 is as good > > as any other number we can use. > > Does Rump have not fd at all? It'd probably still be good to have > different, even if hardcoded, fd numbers, for potentially easier > debugging.
In particular 1 is normally stdout, which could be confusing. Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
