On Wed, 2017-09-27 at 08:57 -0400, Robert VanVossen wrote: > On 9/26/2017 3:12 AM, Dario Faggioli wrote: > > [Cc-list modified by removing someone and adding someone else] > > > > Actually, the best candidate for gaining security support, is IMO > > ARINC. Code is also rather simple and "stable" (hasn't changed in > > the > > last... years!) and it's used by DornerWorks' people for some of > > their > > projects (I think?). It's also not tested in OSSTest, though, and > > considering how special purpose it is, I think we're not totally > > comfortable marking it as Sec-Supported, without feedback from the > > maintainers. > > > > George, Josh, Robert? > > > > Yes, we do still use the ARINC653 scheduler. Since it is so simple, > it hasn't > really needed any modifications in the last couple years. > Hehe :-)
> We are not really sure what kind of feedback you are looking from us > in regards > to marking it sec-supported, but would be happy to try and answer any > questions. > If you have any specific questions or requests, we can discuss it > internally and > get back to you. > Right. So, that's something we are still in the process of defining properly. To have an idea, you may have a look at George's email, in this thread (you weren't Cc-ed yet): https://www.mail-archive.com/xen-devel@lists.xen.org/msg123768.html And also to this other ones: https://www.mail-archive.com/xen-devel@lists.xen.org/msg84376.html https://lists.xenproject.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2016-11/msg00171.h tml Regards, Dario -- <<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel