On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 01:15:11PM +0000, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 06/10/17 14:10, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 12:46:31PM +0000, Andrew Cooper wrote: > >> From 4.10 onwards, the configuration file should use type= in preference to > >> builder/loader. Leave the older options for legacy compatability. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> > >> --- > >> CC: Wei Liu <wei.l...@citrix.com> > >> CC: Roger Pau Monné <roger....@citrix.com> > >> --- > >> config/default-hvm.cfg.in | 5 ++++- > >> config/default-pv.cfg.in | 5 ++++- > >> 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/config/default-hvm.cfg.in b/config/default-hvm.cfg.in > >> index 0de2546..c410eff 100644 > >> --- a/config/default-hvm.cfg.in > >> +++ b/config/default-hvm.cfg.in > >> @@ -1,5 +1,8 @@ > >> name="test-@@ENV@@-@@NAME@@@@VARIATION@@" > >> -builder="hvm" > >> + > >> +type="hvm" > >> +builder="hvm" # Legacy for before Xen 4.10 > > Since this examples are only for >= Xen 4.10, does it really make > > sense to keep the builder option here? > > > > Do we expect people to mix and match example configuration files? > > There is only one version of XTF. It doesn't branch for different > versions of Xen, so needs to support them all.
Oh, I was confused and thought this was a patch to the xl.cfg example files in xen.get, sorry. Reviewed-by: Roger Pau Monné <roger....@citrix.com> Thanks, Roger. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
