On Mon, 2017-09-11 at 12:37 +0800, Haozhong Zhang wrote:
> Overview
> ==================
>
> > (RFC v2 can be found at https://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-
devel/2017-03/msg02401.html)
>
> Well, this RFC v3 changes and inflates a lot from previous versions.
> The primary changes are listed below, most of which are to simplify
> the first implementation and avoid additional inflation.
>
> 1. Drop the support to maintain the frametable and M2P table of PMEM
> in RAM. In the future, we may add this support back.
I don't find any discussion in v2 about this, but I'm thinking putting
those Xen data structures in RAM sometimes is useful (e.g. when
performance is important). It's better not making hard restriction on
this.
>
> 2. Hide host NFIT and deny access to host PMEM from Dom0. In other
> words, the kernel NVDIMM driver is loaded in Dom 0 and existing
> management utilities (e.g. ndctl) do not work in Dom0 anymore. This
> is to workaround the inferences of PMEM access between Dom0 and Xen
> hypervisor. In the future, we may add a stub driver in Dom0 which
> will hold the PMEM pages being used by Xen hypervisor and/or other
> domains.
>
> 3. As there is no NVDIMM driver and management utilities in Dom0 now,
> > we cannot easily specify an area of host NVDIMM (e.g., by
/dev/pmem0)
> and manage NVDIMM in Dom0 (e.g., creating labels). Instead, we
> have to specify the exact MFNs of host PMEM pages in xl domain
> configuration files and the newly added Xen NVDIMM management
> utility xen-ndctl.
>
> If there are indeed some tasks that have to be handled by existing
> driver and management utilities, such as recovery from hardware
> failures, they have to be accomplished out of Xen environment.
What kind of recovery can happen and does the recovery can happen at
runtime? For example, can we recover a portion of NVDIMM assigned to a
certain VM while keep other VMs still using NVDIMM?
>
> After 2. is solved in the future, we would be able to make existing
> driver and management utilities work in Dom0 again.
Is there any reason why we can't do it now? If existing ndctl (with
additional patches) can work then we don't need introduce xen-ndctl
anymore? I think that keeps user interface clearer.
Chao
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
