>>> On 09.11.17 at 16:48, <julien.gr...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 09/11/17 15:47, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>>> On 09.11.17 at 16:39, <julien.gr...@linaro.org> wrote: >>> What I meant is you would replace the 4 occurrences by >>> mfn_to_page(_mfn(...)). If you are happy with that, then fine. >> >> Oh, sure, that's a fine intermediate state, which we have all over >> the place right now. It's clear that it'll take a while to fully carry >> through typesafeness to everywhere. > > Would you be fine with other part of Xen too? If so, I can have a go at > removing completely __page_to_mfn/__mfn_to_page.
Oh, if you want to go that extra mile, that's certainly fine with me. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
