On 06/05/2015 16:44, "Jan Beulich" <jbeul...@suse.com> wrote:
>>>> On 06.05.15 at 17:01, <dunl...@umich.edu> wrote: >> Regarding 5.3.0.1 -- now once again you have a 4th digit where >> non-zero means "release"; and do we need RCs for this? Do we have >> 5.3.0.0.1-rc, and then 5,3,0.1 which is stable? > >No, in such cases I don't expect any RCs, just another release >(just like was done for 4.1.6.1). Couldn't we just go for something like -a, -b, -c instead if we make a mistake Or push up the 2nd number straight away, from say 5.0 to 5.1 I would also say that for public release numbering (aka published final releases, we drop everything after major.minor > >> So how do we officially decide on this? Do we wait for 2 weeks on >> this thread for objections, then do a formal proposal? > >Yeah, that's what's intended I think. Lars? I would summarise the outcome of the thread and ask the committers to formally vote on it Regards Lars _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
