>>> On 08.05.15 at 11:40, <[email protected]> wrote: > All comments has been addressed, just changelog is written partly.
Certainly not. There are still hard tabs in the patch, and there was still a pointless initializer that I had pointed out before. I didn't look further. Jan > On Fri, 2015-05-08 at 09:35 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: >> >>> On 08.05.15 at 10:11, <[email protected]> wrote: >> > When checking the ACPI funciton of C-status, after 100 seconds sleep, >> > the sampling value of C0 status from the xenpm tool decreases. >> > Because C0=NOW()-C1-C2-C3-C4, when NOW() value is during idle time, >> > NOW() value is bigger than last C-status update time, and C0 value >> > is also bigger than ture value. if margin of the second error cannot >> > make up for margin of the first error, the value of C0 would decrease. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Huaitong Han <[email protected]> >> >> Please address all comments on the previous iteration before >> re-submitting. >> >> Jan >> _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
