On Fri, 2015-05-15 at 11:35 -0500, Chong Li wrote: > On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 5:01 AM, Dario Faggioli > <dario.faggi...@citrix.com> wrote: > > > > I mean, a call to libxl_domain_sched_params_set() can be interpreted > > like 'set the passed params for all the vcpus', _get(), I don't know... > > perhaps it should return some sort of ERROR_INVAL, to inform the caller > > that it is libxl_vcpu_sched_params_get() that should be used? > > > > Again, tools maintainers? :-) > > > Hi, Dario, > > Yes. To be consistent with the hypervisor interface (seperate per-dom > and per-vcpu data > structures), this idea seems better. > Just allow me to note that hypervisor's and tools' are different interfaces, so they don't necessarily have to match.
So, yes, if you like my idea/proposal, then fine, but I just wanted to point out as clearly as possible that I wasn't implying or asking that it should be the same as Xen interface... Of course, it happens quite a few time that the interfaces match, which is fine too, it just should not be treated as a goal! :-) > I can do it quick after getting feedbacks from tools maintainers. > Exactly, let's hear from them first. Regards, Dario
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
