"Jan Beulich" <jbeul...@suse.com> writes:

>>>> On 26.05.15 at 15:32, <vkuzn...@redhat.com> wrote:
>> --- a/xen/arch/arm/p2m.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/arm/p2m.c
>> @@ -1709,9 +1709,9 @@ bool_t p2m_mem_access_check(paddr_t gpa, vaddr_t gla, 
>> const struct npfec npfec)
>>  
>>  /*
>>   * Set access type for a region of pfns.
>> - * If start_pfn == -1ul, sets the default access type.
>> + * If start_gfn == -1ul, sets the default access type.
>>   */
>> -long p2m_set_mem_access(struct domain *d, unsigned long pfn, uint32_t nr,
>> +long p2m_set_mem_access(struct domain *d, unsigned long start_gfn, uint32_t 
>> nr,
>>                          uint32_t start, uint32_t mask, xenmem_access_t 
>> access)
>>  {
>>      struct p2m_domain *p2m = p2m_get_hostp2m(d);
>> @@ -1752,14 +1752,15 @@ long p2m_set_mem_access(struct domain *d, unsigned 
>> long pfn, uint32_t nr,
>>      p2m->mem_access_enabled = true;
>>  
>>      /* If request to set default access. */
>> -    if ( pfn == ~0ul )
>> +    if ( start_gfn == ~0ul )
>>      {
>>          p2m->default_access = a;
>>          return 0;
>>      }
>>  
>>      rc = apply_p2m_changes(d, MEMACCESS,
>> -                           pfn_to_paddr(pfn+start), pfn_to_paddr(pfn+nr),
>> +                           pfn_to_paddr(start_gfn + start),
>
> Particularly due to this expression I'm not really happy about the
> start_ prefix that you're adding here, but I'll let the maintainers
> of the respective pieces of code decide if they're happy with it.

Sorry for the ping but it has been almost one month...

-- 
  Vitaly

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Reply via email to