On Wed, 2015-07-08 at 09:56 +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
> Rather than assuming only PV guests need special treatment (and
> dealing with that directly when an IRQ gets set up), keep all guest MSI
> IRQs masked until either the (HVM) guest unmasks them via vMSI or the
> (PV, PVHVM, or PVH) guest sets up an event channel for it.
> 
> To not further clutter the common evtchn_bind_pirq() with x86-specific
> code, introduce an arch_evtchn_bind_pirq() hook instead.
> 
> Reported-by: Sander Eikelenboom <li...@eikelenboom.it>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com>
> Tested-by: Sander Eikelenboom <li...@eikelenboom.it>


For the ARM impact; Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campb...@citrix.com>



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Reply via email to