On 2015/7/16 15:55, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 10.07.15 at 16:50, <george.dun...@eu.citrix.com> wrote:
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 6:33 AM, Tiejun Chen <tiejun.c...@intel.com> wrote:
v7:
It looks like most of the libxl/libxc patches have been acked. It
seems to me that most of the hypervisor patches (1-3, 14-15) are
either ready to go in or pretty close.
Now that I looked over v8 I have to admit that if I was a tools
maintainer I wouldn't want to see some of the tools patches in
with just an ack, but without any review.
I'm somewhat confused at this point.
Acked-by: is often used by the maintainer of the affected code when that
maintainer neither contributed to nor forwarded the patch. It is a
record that the acker has at least reviewed the patch and has indicated
acceptance.
Does this imply this is already reviewed?
Thanks
Tiejun
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
