Okay, I regenerate this patch online. And I just hope its good to be
acked here:
Provided it also works,
Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com>
Why is this marked as Acked-by this time? The same question is raised to
another hvmloader patch as well.
This really makes me confused since you're the key maintainer associated
to this, and I remember you also gave me Acked-by to the first hvmloader
patch. I know this solution is always argued, so does this mean you
still don't think this is good to go in the tree in your perspective, so
you want to leave this Acked-by to other maintainers, right?
And what about patch #7, hvmloader/e820: construct guest e820 table, is
this also not fine to you?
Thanks
Tiejun
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
