But d_config is a libxl_domain_config which is supplied by libxl's
caller. It might contain some rdms.
I guess this line make you or other guys confused so lets delete this
line directly.
I don't think I am very confused.
And if you still worry about something, I can add assert() at the
beginning of this function like this,
assert(!d_config->num_rdms && !d_config->rdms).
If you are sure that this assertion is correct, then that would be
proper.
But as I say above, I don't think it is.
Based on Campbell' explanation I think you guys are raising a reasonable
concern. We shouldn't clear that over there arbitrarily.
Thanks
Tiejun
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
