On Wed, 2015-07-22 at 12:07 +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 22/07/15 11:27, Ian Campbell wrote: > > On Mon, 2015-07-20 at 11:37 +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote: > > > +TOOLSTACK (deprecated) > > > +---------------------- > > > + > > > +> *This record was only present for transitionary purposes > > > during > > "transitionary" isn't really a word... transitional is (even if it > > sounds a bit odd to me)? > > It very much is. > > http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/transition > > It is an appropriate derivative in this case.
Fair enough, my spell checker mislead me on this one it seems. > +> development. It is should not be used.* > > Does it needs to be accepted on restore for N->N+1 purposes (or N+M > > for > > M>1 since you care about that)? Or does the conversion routine turn > > it > > into something else? > > The libxc toolstack record was used in the #LIBXL_HVM_COMPAT phase, > but > nothing (not even the conversion script) will generate one any more. Perfect. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
