> -----Original Message----- > From: Roger Pau Monné [mailto:roger....@citrix.com] > Sent: 31 July 2015 12:42 > To: Paul Durrant; Sander Eikelenboom > Cc: Andrew Cooper; xen-devel > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [BUG] Emulation issues > > El 31/07/15 a les 13.39, Paul Durrant ha escrit: > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Sander Eikelenboom [mailto:li...@eikelenboom.it] > >> Sent: 31 July 2015 12:12 > >> To: Paul Durrant > >> Cc: Andrew Cooper; Roger Pau Monne; xen-devel > >> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [BUG] Emulation issues > >> > >> > >> Friday, July 31, 2015, 12:22:16 PM, you wrote: > >> > >>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>> From: xen-devel-boun...@lists.xen.org [mailto:xen-devel- > >>>> boun...@lists.xen.org] On Behalf Of Paul Durrant > >>>> Sent: 30 July 2015 14:20 > >>>> To: Andrew Cooper; Roger Pau Monne; xen-devel > >>>> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [BUG] Emulation issues > >>>> > >>>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>>> From: Andrew Cooper [mailto:andrew.coop...@citrix.com] > >>>>> Sent: 30 July 2015 14:19 > >>>>> To: Paul Durrant; Roger Pau Monne; xen-devel > >>>>> Subject: Re: [BUG] Emulation issues > >>>>> > >>>>> On 30/07/15 14:12, Paul Durrant wrote: > >>>>>>> (XEN) io.c:165:d19v0 Weird HVM ioemulation status 1. > >>>>>>> (XEN) domain_crash called from io.c:166 > >>>>>>> (XEN) d19v0 weird emulation state 1 > >>>>>>> (XEN) io.c:165:d19v0 Weird HVM ioemulation status 1. > >>>>>>> (XEN) domain_crash called from io.c:166 > >>>>>>> (XEN) d19v0 weird emulation state 1 > >>>>>>> (XEN) io.c:165:d19v0 Weird HVM ioemulation status 1. > >>>>>>> (XEN) domain_crash called from io.c:166 > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> Hmm. Can't understand how that's happening... handle_pio() > >> shouldn't > >>>> be > >>>>> called unless the state is STATE_IORESP_READY and yet the inner > >> function > >>>> is > >>>>> hitting the default case in the switch. > >>>>> > >>>>> Sounds like something is changing the state between the two checks. > Is > >>>>> this shared memory writeable by qemu? > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> No, this is the internal state. I really can't see how it's being > >>>> changed. > >>>> > >> > >>> I've tried to replicate your test on my rig (which is an old AMD box but > quite > >> a big one). Even so I only seem to get about half the VMs to start. The > >> shutdown works fine, and I don't see any problems on the Xen console. > I'm > >> using an older build of Xen but still one with my series in. I'll try > >> pulling up > to > >> the same commit as you and try again. > >> > >>> Paul > >> > >> Hi Paul, > >> > >> From what i recall it started around when Tiejun Chen's series went in. > >> > > Since I can reproduce this at will I will attempt to perform a > bisection. Maybe this can help narrow down the issue. >
Thanks. That would be very helpful. I will continue to try to repro. Paul > Roger. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
