>>> On 12.08.15 at 12:00, <julien.gr...@citrix.com> wrote: > > On 12/08/2015 08:21, Jan Beulich wrote: >> This paragraph should get "on ARM" added somewhere. There is no >> inherent requirement for such a restriction on another architecture >> Xen might get ported to; the only restriction of the current interface >> is that it can't support page sizes from 64k up. On an architecture >> e.g. not supporting other than 8k pages things would still be fine, >> yet the comment above would then be wrong. >> >> An alternative might be to say "... is always the smallest >> architecturally supported page size (e.g. 4k on x86 and ARM) >> irrespective of ...". > > While this is true today, I don't see anything that would prevent a new > architecture to respect this.
I don't think I get what you're trying to say here. > What about replacing 4KB by "Xen Page size" and define this size per > architecture in arch-*.h? That looks okay to me. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
