>>> On 14.08.15 at 12:30, <rcojoc...@bitdefender.com> wrote:
> On 08/14/2015 01:21 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>> On 14.08.15 at 11:54, <rcojoc...@bitdefender.com> wrote:
>>> @@ -460,6 +459,18 @@ typedef enum __packed {
>>> SMAP_CHECK_DISABLED, /* disable the check */
>>> } smap_check_policy_t;
>>>
>>> +/*
>>> + * Should we emulate the next matching instruction on VCPU resume
>>> + * after a vm_event?
>>> + */
>>> +struct vm_event {
>>> + uint32_t emulate_flags;
>>> + unsigned long gpa;
>>> + unsigned long eip;
>>> + struct vm_event_emul_read_data emul_read_data;
>>> + struct monitor_write_data write_data;
>>> +};
>>
>> ... this would better go into asm-x86/vm_event.h (despite it meaning
>> that the file will then be included by basically everything).
>
> Ack.
And actually (having looked another time) I don't think this implies
including asm/vm_event.h from asm-x86/domain.h.
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
