On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 06:40:22AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > >>> On 26.08.15 at 14:33, <daniel.ki...@oracle.com> wrote: > > Do you suggest that I should put this functionality (PE with multiboot > > headers) on top of this patch series? Well, it is possible but this > > series is big and I would like to avoid to make it bigger. I prefer to > > get current patches into Xen tree and then work on new features (it > > should not take so long because as I can see we almost agreed most > > of stuff in that case). Or if at least half patches of current series > > will be accepted (as I can see there is a chance to do that with v3) > > then I can work on this functionality and put it on top of second not > > applied part. Does it make sense? > > Yes. I'm not objecting to deferring that part. All I want is you to make
Great! > sure not to submit any changes potentially conflicting with the end OK. > goal of having a single binary (which as I understand it can only be a > PE one). This is the end goal but I think that we should have transitional phase when both formats (ELF and PE) are avaibale for users. Just in case. Daniel _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
