As an aside, xen components in QEMU and Linux Coverity scans seem to be also higher than the average for those projects
QEMU: .*/xen.* - density 0.52 LINUX: .*/drivers/xen/.* - density 1.40 Regards Lars > On 21 Sep 2015, at 13:10, Lars Kurth <lars.kurth....@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi folks, > > as preparation for the xen 4.6 release (and putting together PR), I was > looking at Coverity stats. It seems that we made a little progress in terms > of defect density, but that we have fallen behind compared to Linux & QEMU. > > Defect Density & Outstanding Defects > Xen: 0.58 & 678 > Linux: 0.51 & 5248 > QEMU: 0.10 & 109 > > I attached the stats of Xen, QEMU and Linux as screenshots. > > I am wondering, whether we should go for a push early in the next release > cycle to address these. > > Regards > Lars > > == QEMU == > <qemu.png> > > == Linux == > <linux.png> > > == Xen == > <xenproject.png> > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
