Hi, Kornrad > -----Original Message----- > From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2015 1:39 AM > To: Xu, Quan > Cc: [email protected]; Dong, Eddie; [email protected]; > [email protected]; [email protected]; Nakajima, Jun; [email protected]; > Tian, Kevin; [email protected]; Zhang, Yang Z; [email protected]; > [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [Patch RFC 11/13] vt-d: If the Device-TLB flush is > still not > completed when > > > index 5dc0033..f661c8c 100644 > > --- a/xen/include/xen/hvm/iommu.h > > +++ b/xen/include/xen/hvm/iommu.h > > @@ -20,6 +20,7 @@ > > #define __XEN_HVM_IOMMU_H__ > > > > #include <xen/iommu.h> > > +#include <xen/wait.h> > > #include <xen/list.h> > > #include <asm/hvm/iommu.h> > > > > @@ -56,12 +57,15 @@ struct hvm_iommu { > > struct page_list_head qi_hold_page_list; > > spinlock_t qi_lock; > > > > + struct waitqueue_head qi_wq; > > + > > > Is there anything that mandates this must be an HVM guest? As in - can't you > have ATS with an PV guest (and doing passthrough?)
Yes, this patch set if just for HVM guest. It is complicated to support both PV guest and HVM guest. Quan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
