On Mon, 2015-10-12 at 07:22 -0600, Jan Beulich wrote: > > > > On 10.10.15 at 03:38, <wei.w.w...@intel.com> wrote: > > On 09/10/2015 04:01, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > Please also remove "register_cpu_notifier(&cpu_nfb)" in the > > cpufreq_register_driver function as well. (found that it has > > already been > > included in cpufreq_presmp_nfb()). > > Yes, I think this is it, and I seem to recall having complained about > this in an earlier version of the series (and I overlooked it now). > In fact, I did not spot it with `git diff' either (and the changelog says "Move the driver register function"!). > Dario, if could you let us know whether that helps? > Yep, I confirm that it was it. Avoiding calling register_cpu_notifier() from cpufreq_register_driver(), I am able to put CPUs offline and then back online again. I've got to go AFK for a bit now, but I'm fine sending a patch later in the afternoon. If someone wants to try beating me, no hard feelings. :-) Thanks and Regards, Dario -- <<This happens because I choose it to happen!>> (Raistlin Majere) ----------------------------------------------------------------- Dario Faggioli, Ph.D, http://about.me/dario.faggioli Senior Software Engineer, Citrix Systems R&D Ltd., Cambridge (UK)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel