On 07/10/2015 11:46, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 14.09.15 at 04:32, <wei.w.w...@intel.com> wrote:
> > --- a/xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/acpi/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> > @@ -647,9 +648,11 @@ static int __init cpufreq_driver_init(void)
> > int ret = 0;
> >
> > if ((cpufreq_controller == FREQCTL_xen) &&
> > - (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_INTEL))
> > - ret = cpufreq_register_driver(&acpi_cpufreq_driver);
> > - else if ((cpufreq_controller == FREQCTL_xen) &&
> > + (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_INTEL)) {
> > + ret = intel_pstate_init();
> > + if (ret)
> > + ret = cpufreq_register_driver(&acpi_cpufreq_driver);
> > + } else if ((cpufreq_controller == FREQCTL_xen) &&
> > (boot_cpu_data.x86_vendor == X86_VENDOR_AMD))
> > ret = powernow_register_driver();
>
> Since you're basically modifying the entire body of the function, please gets
> its
> coding style corrected as you fiddle with it.
>
The coding style here is aligned with the existing piece of code in this file.
If it's also good to make the file have two coding styles, please let me know.
Best,
Wei
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
