On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 03:34:30PM +0000, David Vrabel wrote:
> On 17/11/15 15:08, Wei Liu wrote:
> > There are mixed usage of libxl__sprintf(gc) and GCSPRINTF. Convert all
> > libxl__sprintf to GCSPRINTF.
> 
> This looks like pointless churn /and/ GCSPRINTF is /less/ readable than
> libxl__sprintf(gc,...) because the reader now has to also look up what
> GCSPRINTF does.
> 

The goal is to make things consistent across libxl code base. Currently
there are 400+ GCSPRINTF vs 240+ libxl__sprintf, which is causing
confusion for contributors. If you think libxl__sprintf is clear you can
submit patch to turn that 400+ GCSPRINTF to libxl__sprintf.

Wei.

> David
> 
> 

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Reply via email to