On 18/11/15 11:04, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 18.11.15 at 12:00, <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> wrote: >> As for the problem at hand, I don't see what was wrong with v1. >> >> Fundamentally, we have three different variations of the same structure; >> two of which require special compat handling. Pretending otherwise is >> just silly. > And if we gain a few more additions, we'll end up with half a dozen > slightly different structure declarations in the public interface? If > you consider the first step (adding tsc_aux) a mistake, let's not > repeat the same mistake again (even if right now it might _seem_ > to be reasonable to some of us).
As part of cpuid handling fixes, I will be removing all of this from the hypervisor The result doesn't need to live very long; I would recommend the route which has more-obvious-correct code. I am not fussed as to which route this ends up being. ~Andrew _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
