On 11/30/15 9:55 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 30.11.15 at 16:34, <car...@cardoe.com> wrote: >> On 11/30/15 7:59 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>>>> On 24.11.15 at 18:51, <car...@cardoe.com> wrote: >>>> --- /dev/null >>>> +++ b/xen/scripts/kconfig/Makefile.linux >>>> @@ -0,0 +1,317 @@ >>> >>> This doesn't seem to be referenced anywhere. >> >> Its the central file for building kconfig. Its refereinced in >> xen/scripts/kconfig/Makefile on line 63. This is the only file I've >> renamed from its original name in the Linux source tree. > > In a later patch I think?
Yes. This whole patch is just bringing in files from Linux 4.2.0 unmodified. I plan on modifying the commit message like Ian Jackson suggested. > >>>> --- /dev/null >>>> +++ b/xen/scripts/kconfig/gconf.c >>>> @@ -0,0 +1,1521 @@ >>> >>> I think I had asked before, and with us not wanting any user visible >>> prompts for now I wonder even more: Do we really need [gmnq]conf? >>> All I think we really need is conf. >> >> Well as you (and others) have commented about the fact that KEXEC and >> the ARM UARTs should be user configurable which is why I included those. >> So I'll continue to leave those in ok? > > Afaic I'd prefer a minimal import as a first step. Adding further > frontends - if really needed - could be done later. > > Jan > So you want me to break this patch up to bring in the frontends individually? Since there is a request to have KEXEC and the UARTs configurable by the user I would bring in all these frontends. -- Doug Goldstein
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
