On 06/01/16 16:52, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-12-18 at 14:14 +0100, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> Support the xenstore domain flag for obtaining domain info.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgr...@suse.com>
>> ---
>> tools/libxc/include/xenctrl.h | 2 +-
>> tools/libxc/xc_domain.c | 17 +++++++++--------
>> 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/tools/libxc/include/xenctrl.h
>> b/tools/libxc/include/xenctrl.h
>> index 01a6dda..45d8ff6 100644
>> --- a/tools/libxc/include/xenctrl.h
>> +++ b/tools/libxc/include/xenctrl.h
>> @@ -456,7 +456,7 @@ typedef struct xc_dominfo {
>> uint32_t ssidref;
>> unsigned int dying:1, crashed:1, shutdown:1,
>> paused:1, blocked:1, running:1,
>> - hvm:1, debugged:1, pvh:1;
>> + hvm:1, debugged:1, pvh:1, xs_domain:1;
>
> All the other flags omit the _domain/_guest since it is implicit in the
> context I think.
>
> "xs" would be ok, so would "xenstore" or "xenstored" I think.
>
> You might want to consider similar arguments for DOMINF and the create
> flag, or you might want to argue that this field should be xs_domain for
> consistency with those.
In case there are no objections from others, I'll go with "xenstore".
>
> Apart from what colour to paint the shed to code looks trivially correct.
Can I take this as an "Ack"?
Juergen
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
