On 1/11/16 8:24 AM, Jan Beulich wrote: >>>> On 09.01.16 at 00:17, <car...@cardoe.com> wrote: >> This converts the usage of NR_CPUS / MAX_PHYS_CPUS to Kconfig as >> CONFIG_NR_CPUS. > > Considering the size of the patch, the doubling of the identifier's > length, and the fact that even Linux continues to use NR_CPUS > I wonder whether we wouldn't be better of simply having > > #define NR_CPUS CONFIG_NR_CPUS > > Jan >
Is that a "please do this for a v2" or "what do the other maintainers think?" statement? -- Doug Goldstein
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
