>>> On 16.01.16 at 06:01, <zhaoshengl...@huawei.com> wrote:
> --- a/xen/drivers/acpi/tables/tbxfroot.c
> +++ b/xen/drivers/acpi/tables/tbxfroot.c
> @@ -49,6 +49,12 @@
> #define _COMPONENT ACPI_TABLES
> ACPI_MODULE_NAME("tbxfroot")
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM
> +acpi_status __init acpi_find_root_pointer(acpi_native_uint * table_address)
> +{
> + return_ACPI_STATUS(AE_NOT_FOUND);
> +}
> +#else
> /* Local prototypes */
> static u8 *acpi_tb_scan_memory_for_rsdp(u8 * start_address, u32 length);
>
> @@ -271,3 +277,4 @@ static u8 *__init acpi_tb_scan_memory_for_rsdp(u8 *
> start_address, u32 length)
> start_address));
> return_PTR(NULL);
> }
> +#endif
You modify ACPI CA code here, which should be avoided if at all
possible. Why don't you simply port over Linux'es solution (which
changes osl.c instead), the more that now we have Linux-like
Kconfig?
Jan
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
