On Tue, 2016-01-26 at 14:17 +0000, Paul Durrant wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Wei Liu [mailto:wei.l...@citrix.com] > > Sent: 21 January 2016 15:46 > > To: Ian Campbell > > Cc: Paul Durrant; xen-de...@lists.xenproject.org; Ian Jackson; Jan > > Beulich; > > Keir (Xen.org); Tim (Xen.org); Wei Liu; Roger Pau Monne > > Subject: Re: [PATCH] public/io/netif.h: change semantics of "request- > > multicast-control" flag > > > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 03:29:36PM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote: > > > On Wed, 2016-01-20 at 12:50 +0000, Paul Durrant wrote: > > > > My patch b2700877 "move and amend multicast control documentation" > > > > clarified use of the multicast control protocol between frontend > > > > and > > > > backend. However, it transpires that the restrictions that > > > > documentation > > > > placed on the "request-multicast-control" flag make it hard for a > > > > frontend to enable 'all multicast' promiscuous mode, in that to do > > > > so > > > > would require the frontend and backend to disconnect and re- > > > > connect. > > > > > > > > This patch adds a new "feature-dynamic-multicast-control" flag to > > > > allow > > > > a backend to advertise that it will watch "request-multicast- > > > > control" > > hence > > > > allowing it to be meaningfully modified by the frontend at any time > > > > rather > > > > than only when the frontend and backend are disconnected. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Paul Durrant <paul.durr...@citrix.com> > > > > Cc: Ian Campbell <ian.campb...@citrix.com> > > > > Cc: Ian Jackson <ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com> > > > > Cc: Jan Beulich <jbeul...@suse.com> > > > > Cc: Keir Fraser <k...@xen.org> > > > > Cc: Tim Deegan <t...@xen.org> > > > > > > > > > This looks good to me, but also adding Wei (Linux netback + BSD > > > stuff) and > > > Roger (BSD stuff) for their perspective. > > > > > > I should probably have done that for the last set of netif.h changes > > > too, > > > since apart from the nominal maintainers of xen/include/public/io/*.h > > > it's > > > worth getting input from the maintainers of the consumers. Not sure > > > we > > can > > > express that very well in MAINTAINERS :-(. > > > > > > Ian. > > > > LGTM > > > > Acked-by: Wei Liu <wei.l...@citrix.com> > > Ping? I notice this patch is not yet applied.
I'd have done it yesterday but the machines I needed were offline. Now done. > > Paul > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xen.org http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
