On 2/3/2016 1:52 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Wed, 2016-02-03 at 13:37 +0200, Corneliu ZUZU wrote:

I just now applied a previous v2 which was already in my queue. Was this
just an accidental resend of v2 or is there some important change and this
is really a v3?

When __p2m_get_mem_access gets called, the p2m lock is already taken
by either get_page_from_gva or p2m_get_mem_access.
Possible code paths:
1)      -> get_page_from_gva
                -> p2m_mem_access_check_and_get_page
                        -> __p2m_get_mem_access
2)      -> p2m_get_mem_access
                -> __p2m_get_mem_access

In both cases if __p2m_get_mem_access subsequently gets to
call p2m_lookup (happens if !radix_tree_lookup(...)), a hypervisor
hang will occur, since p2m_lookup also spin-locks on the p2m lock.

This bug-fix simply replaces the p2m_lookup call from
__p2m_get_mem_access
with a call to __p2m_lookup and also adds an ASSERT to ensure that the
p2m lock
is already taken upon __p2m_get_mem_access entry.

Signed-off-by: Corneliu ZUZU <cz...@bitdefender.com>

---
Changed since v1:
   * added p2m-lock ASSERT
---
  xen/arch/arm/p2m.c | 4 +++-
  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/xen/arch/arm/p2m.c b/xen/arch/arm/p2m.c
index 2190908..e8e6db4 100644
--- a/xen/arch/arm/p2m.c
+++ b/xen/arch/arm/p2m.c
@@ -468,6 +468,8 @@ static int __p2m_get_mem_access(struct domain *d,
gfn_t gfn,
  #undef ACCESS
      };
+ ASSERT(spin_is_locked(&p2m->lock));
+
      /* If no setting was ever set, just return rwx. */
      if ( !p2m->mem_access_enabled )
      {
@@ -490,7 +492,7 @@ static int __p2m_get_mem_access(struct domain *d,
gfn_t gfn,
           * No setting was found in the Radix tree. Check if the
           * entry exists in the page-tables.
           */
-        paddr_t maddr = p2m_lookup(d, gfn_x(gfn) << PAGE_SHIFT, NULL);
+        paddr_t maddr = __p2m_lookup(d, gfn_x(gfn) << PAGE_SHIFT, NULL);
          if ( INVALID_PADDR == maddr )
              return -ESRCH;
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
No, sorry, this is just a duplicate of the 1st v2, I thought the first one was not sent properly (after waiting a few days and noticing
I was no longer finding it on the web).
Ignore this one. And thanks.

Corneliu.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Reply via email to